Dear Readers:
I have a client who works at Bank of America who saw a memo posted around the loan modification department that while loan modifications continue to be processed, they will no longer be continuing foreclosure sales in California. Now it is uncertain if that applies to all of Bank of America or not but take a look at this downward spiral that Bank of America is facing:
Oct. 19, 2010 - Because of the Credit Card and Debit Card rules sponsored by Senator Durbin, Bank of America Corp. reported today a loss of $7.6 billion in the third quarter, as it took a writedown of more than $10 billion to prepare for new legislation that it says could virtually wipe out its debit card revenue.
Bank of America currently makes about $2.9 billion annually in debit-card revenue, and says it expects to have to shed up to 80 percent, or about $2.3 billion. The $10.4 billion writedown is an accounting charge that reduces the goodwill value of the card services unit. BUT keep in mind, the Merchant's Payments Coalition pointed the finger at BofA stating that it was only trying to divert attention away from its foreclosure problems. Interestingly, the mortgage unit lost $344 million this year, as opposed to the $1.6 BILLION that it lost last year.
But what's putting some pressure here at home to not provide loan modifications in my opinion is the new capital requirements that banks are having to meet wherein they must maintain higher liquidity and capital levels under the Basel III international regulations. So in order to meet those requirements. . . FORECLOSURE FORECLOSURE FORECOSURE! Makes more capital available and increased liquidity!
But tell me something readers. . . . Bloomberg Business Week writers Dawn Kopecki and Michael J. Moore writing on October 28, 2010 that it's going to be the worst decade for banks since the Great Depression....
YET: On November 5, 2010, David Frank from Forex said that Bank of America's stocks are UP almost 2 percentage points since the Federal Reserve Board announced that the banks could increase dividend payments.
HOW is it possible that Bank of America on one hand is posting devastating losses and on the brink of needing bail out funds from the federal government. . . yet there is a plan to pay dividends to its investors. Someone had to lobby for that change with the Federal Reserve Board.
If I were a betting lawyer, I would say that with the foreclosures that Bank of America have been snatching up in a race to beat congress from taking action to stop their foreclosure frenzy. The properties they seize for themselves end up building a portfolio that when sold create liquidity for the bank. But if you ever have attended a foreclosure auction, there are plenty of cash rich investors coming in and creating bidding wars. They are not getting "DEALS" on these homes as much as you would expect.
My advice, if you have money, hold on to it. The roller coaster ride is not over yet, we have not hit bottom. From an investment point of view, Bank of America attracts more investors as it gets troubled assets off the books. The losses posted in the mortgage department that I referenced in this article, reflect, that Bank of America took its losses up front. Took it's tax deductions for the losses up front. Now that they show fewer losses this year, sadly wealthy investors will flock to Bank of America seeing the dramatic drop in losses.
Like my good friend Melody always says. . . I'm just saying. . . .
Bank of America currently makes about $2.9 billion annually in debit-card revenue, and says it expects to have to shed up to 80 percent, or about $2.3 billion. The $10.4 billion writedown is an accounting charge that reduces the goodwill value of the card services unit. BUT keep in mind, the Merchant's Payments Coalition pointed the finger at BofA stating that it was only trying to divert attention away from its foreclosure problems. Interestingly, the mortgage unit lost $344 million this year, as opposed to the $1.6 BILLION that it lost last year.
But what's putting some pressure here at home to not provide loan modifications in my opinion is the new capital requirements that banks are having to meet wherein they must maintain higher liquidity and capital levels under the Basel III international regulations. So in order to meet those requirements. . . FORECLOSURE FORECLOSURE FORECOSURE! Makes more capital available and increased liquidity!
But tell me something readers. . . . Bloomberg Business Week writers Dawn Kopecki and Michael J. Moore writing on October 28, 2010 that it's going to be the worst decade for banks since the Great Depression....
YET: On November 5, 2010, David Frank from Forex said that Bank of America's stocks are UP almost 2 percentage points since the Federal Reserve Board announced that the banks could increase dividend payments.
HOW is it possible that Bank of America on one hand is posting devastating losses and on the brink of needing bail out funds from the federal government. . . yet there is a plan to pay dividends to its investors. Someone had to lobby for that change with the Federal Reserve Board.
If I were a betting lawyer, I would say that with the foreclosures that Bank of America have been snatching up in a race to beat congress from taking action to stop their foreclosure frenzy. The properties they seize for themselves end up building a portfolio that when sold create liquidity for the bank. But if you ever have attended a foreclosure auction, there are plenty of cash rich investors coming in and creating bidding wars. They are not getting "DEALS" on these homes as much as you would expect.
My advice, if you have money, hold on to it. The roller coaster ride is not over yet, we have not hit bottom. From an investment point of view, Bank of America attracts more investors as it gets troubled assets off the books. The losses posted in the mortgage department that I referenced in this article, reflect, that Bank of America took its losses up front. Took it's tax deductions for the losses up front. Now that they show fewer losses this year, sadly wealthy investors will flock to Bank of America seeing the dramatic drop in losses.
Like my good friend Melody always says. . . I'm just saying. . . .
2 comments:
Hey there,
We have been reading the articles on your website (http://letbksaveyou.blogspot.com/) and are very impressed with the quality of your information.
We have a team of copywriters who specialize in writing articles on various topics and would like to write an original article for you to use on your website – this article will not be used anywhere else on the Internet.
In exchange all we ask is that we can have one links within the body of the article back to one of our sites.
If you are interested in having us write an article or exchanging links for your website please just let me know and we would be more than happy to have one written for you within weeks.
Kind regards,
James Vohwinkle
Nevada-Las Vegas
Financial Advisor - Financial Services Associat
Contact me :jamesvohwinkle@gmail.com
For those lawyers who do offer the service, it is now more expensive for their clients because it takes more of their time. This means that you will pay more for bankruptcy under the redesigned bankruptcy laws. For example, bankruptcy lawyers now have to personally attest to the accuracy of the information provided by their clients in the bankruptcy courts. This means that they have to take the time to personally research all of the information provided by their clients. The more time a lawyer spends with a client's case, the more that case will cost.
Post a Comment